What educators reported
- Minutes
- Reported grading time for a full class set of essays, down from 10 to 15 hours
- 4 groups
- High school English and ESL, middle school social studies, electives, and district leadership
- 5 themes
- Synthesized from transcripts plus two independent field-note sets
About this study
Over a multi-day site visit in spring 2026, the CoGrader research team observed classrooms and conducted semi-structured group interviews across two campuses of a Texas ISD. This was a Chromebook district in West Texas with daily professional learning community meetings at both schools. We spoke with high school English and ESL teachers, middle school social studies teachers, an elective department team, and district leadership.
Full meeting transcripts, structured field notes, and raw observation notes were combined and analyzed through inductive thematic coding, refining clustered quotes into five themes. The findings below describe practitioner experience as educators reported it, rather than measured effects.
What we found
Grading time collapses, and teachers reinvest it in instruction
The most consistent message across all three sets of source materials was that grading, which once dominated evenings and weekends, is now compressed into minutes. Importantly, that time is not simply returned to the teacher’s personal life. Teachers reported reinvesting it in conferencing with students about the feedback the tool produced.
“For me, it has freed up so much time. It used to take me 10 to 15 hours to grade one essay from all my students. … Well, now it’s, what, five minutes, and I’m done with all of them? And so now I’m not afraid of putting out another assignment.”
Teachers assign writing more often
Because the cost of grading a class set has fallen, teachers across both campuses described assigning writing more frequently, framing it as a change in what they were willing to ask of students rather than only a change in how long grading takes.
“After using, I’m more likely to give a writing assignment, because I don’t have to sit down and grade.”
Perceived fairness is the strongest trust signal in the field
Teachers repeatedly returned to the idea that CoGrader removes both the appearance and the reality of bias. Students stop questioning grades against one another, and teachers stop second-guessing themselves on holistic scoring. Field notes describe this as removing a barrier between teacher and student. Teachers extended it to their own biases, describing the tool as a check against themselves and not only a labor-saver.
“There’s no favoritism. It’s all, you know, this is all consistent and based on the rubric and based on facts and evidence that we have right here in front of us.”
Students begin asking for feedback, and using it to revise
The outcome teachers described most enthusiastically was a shift in student behavior. Rather than receiving feedback passively, students began seeking it out and revising before submitting, asking to run drafts again to see whether a revision had moved the score. Teachers also used the translation feature to deliver feedback to multilingual learners in a language they could act on.
“I have this group of wonderful writers this year, and they constantly want it to be checked. Is it a five? Is it a five?”
“I’m also able to translate the feedback into Spanish so they can actually understand the feedback.”
District leadership is anchoring instruction around what the tool makes visible
Beyond individual classrooms, district leadership has begun anchoring instructional practice around CoGrader. The district’s writing strategy, its differentiation approach for multilingual learners, and its state-aligned rubrics are increasingly organized around the feedback the tool surfaces, and teams meet in professional learning communities to align on scoring across grade levels.
Where the research goes next
Texas districts are being asked to do something new. The redesigned state assessment puts a constructed response in front of every student, which calls for writing practice at a volume no teacher could grade by hand. That is the problem this district brought us, and the one we are building for.
The work coming out of this visit points straight at it: scoring districts can rely on across their own rubrics, feedback students can read, exemplar papers so a department can calibrate together, and multi-question assignments that match how Texas districts build their common assessments. We are also deepening our work with the assessment platforms these districts already run, so writing checks land in the tools teachers open every day.
See what this looks like in your district
A 30-minute walkthrough with our schools team, using your rubrics and your state’s assessments.
About the authors
-
Dr. Jody Britten
Head of Research, CoGrader
Ph.D., Curriculum and Instruction, University of Kansas. M.S., Teaching and Leadership, University of Kansas.
Twenty years in educational technology and digital learning, starting as a K-12 classroom teacher. For over a decade she led digital learning strategy, research, and evaluation work for education systems in the United States and abroad. Chief architect of the Future Ready Schools framework, used by more than 3,500 U.S. schools and districts.
LinkedIn -
Dr. Jamie Basham
External researcher
Ph.D., Educational Psychology and Special Education, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. M.S., Special Education, Eastern Illinois University.
Professor of special education and founder of a global nonprofit that supports implementation and research around Universal Design for Learning. Leads federally funded research and technical assistance projects on learner-centered design, AI, and technology in learning.
LinkedIn -
Dr. Jose Blackorby
External researcher
Ph.D., Special Education and Multicultural Education, University of Washington. M.A., University of Washington.
Research director and lecturer with nearly 25 years leading national studies, experimental evaluations, and design work in literacy, mathematics, STEM, and assessment. A national leader in special education policy and Universal Design for Learning.
LinkedIn
Cite this brief
Britten, J., Basham, J., & Blackorby, J. (2026). CoGrader in the classroom: What teachers and district leaders reported after a year of use in a Texas ISD [Research brief]. CoGrader.
Copyright May 2026, New York, NY.
The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305J250071 to Modern Learner Media, LLC. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education.
