New York State Regents ELA Part 3 Rubric - Text Analysis Exposition

New York State Regents ELA Part 3 Rubric - Text Analysis Exposition

4 min read May 19, 2024
✨ Summary: Text Analysis Exposition Rubric for NY Regents ELA exam. Clear scoring guidelines and criteria.

New York State Regents Text Analysis Exposition Rubric

Key Points

  • This rubric guides assessment of text analysis responses on the NY Regents ELA exam
  • It evaluates four main criteria: content/analysis, evidence, organization, and conventions
  • It uses a 1-4 scoring scale with detailed performance descriptors
  • It aligns with state standards for analytical writing

Full Rubric

ScoreContent and AnalysisCommand of EvidenceCoherence, Organization, and StyleControl of Conventions
4- Introduce well-reasoned central idea and writing strategy- Demonstrate thoughtful analysis of author’s use of writing strategy- Present ideas clearly and consistently- Make effective use of specific evidence- Exhibit logical organization- Establish/maintain formal style with precise language- Demonstrate control with infrequent errors
3- Introduce clear central idea and writing strategy- Demonstrate appropriate analysis- Present ideas sufficiently- Make adequate use of relevant evidence- Exhibit acceptable organization- Maintain formal style with appropriate language- Demonstrate partial control with occasional errors
2- Introduce central idea/writing strategy- Demonstrate superficial analysis- Present ideas inconsistently or inadequately- Use some evidence that may be irrelevant- Exhibit inconsistent organization- Lack formal style with basic language- Demonstrate emerging control with some errors
1- Introduce confused/incomplete central idea- Demonstrate minimal analysis- Present little or no evidence- Exhibit little organization- Use incoherent or inappropriate language- Demonstrate lack of control with frequent errors

Detailed Rubric Breakdown

Content and Analysis

ScoreCriteria
4- Introduce a well-reasoned central idea and writing strategy that clearly establish criteria for analysis- Demonstrate thoughtful analysis of author’s use of writing strategy to develop central idea
3- Introduce a clear central idea and writing strategy that establish criteria for analysis- Demonstrate appropriate analysis of author’s use of writing strategy
2- Introduce a central idea and/or writing strategy- Demonstrate superficial analysis of author’s use of writing strategy
1- Introduce confused or incomplete central idea/writing strategy- Demonstrate minimal analysis of author’s use of writing strategy

Command of Evidence

ScoreCriteria
4- Present ideas clearly and consistently- Make effective use of specific and relevant evidence to support analysis
3- Present ideas sufficiently- Make adequate use of relevant evidence to support analysis
2- Present ideas inconsistently/inadequately- Use some evidence that may be irrelevant
1- Present little or no evidence from the text

Coherence, Organization, and Style

ScoreCriteria
4- Exhibit logical organization to create cohesive response- Establish/maintain formal style with precise language
3- Exhibit acceptable organization to create coherent response- Maintain formal style with appropriate language
2- Exhibit inconsistent organization- Lack formal style, using basic/imprecise language
1- Exhibit little organization- Use predominantly incoherent language

Control of Conventions

ScoreCriteria
4- Demonstrate control of conventions with infrequent errors
3- Demonstrate partial control with occasional errors that don’t hinder comprehension
2- Demonstrate emerging control with errors that may hinder comprehension
1- Demonstrate lack of control with frequent errors that make comprehension difficult

How to Use This Rubric

  1. For Teachers: Use this rubric to assess students’ ability to analyze texts and evaluate their writing skills across multiple dimensions.

  2. For Students: Use as a guide when practicing text analysis responses. Focus on all four criteria for comprehensive analytical writing.

  3. For Test Prep: Understand expectations for each score level to target areas for improvement.

Tips for Success in Regents Text Analysis

  1. Strong Analysis: Develop a well-reasoned central idea and identify key writing strategies.

  2. Evidence Usage: Support analysis with specific, relevant evidence from the text.

  3. Clear Organization: Create a logically organized response with appropriate transitions.

  4. Professional Style: Maintain formal style and precise language throughout.

  5. Proper Conventions: Pay attention to grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

  6. Writing Strategy: Clearly explain how the author’s writing strategies develop the central idea.

  7. Textual Support: Use direct quotations and specific references to support your analysis.

Important Notes

  • Personal responses with minimal text reference score no higher than 1
  • Completely copied responses receive a 0
  • Responses unrelated to task/illegible receive a 0

Regular practice using this rubric will help students develop strong analytical writing skills for the Regents exam. Remember to address all components in your response and maintain focus on analyzing the author’s writing strategies.