Standards
Free resources for teaching 8th Grade Reading: Informational Text Standards. Explore the essential Common Core State Standards (CCSS) with our comprehensive guide.
8 minutes reading time

Brief Explanation of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS)

The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) are a set of high-quality academic guidelines in English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics that outline what a student should know and be able to do at the end of each grade. The goal? To ensure students are college and career-ready by the time they graduate high school. Think of CCSS as a clear roadmap for teachers and students, designed to provide consistent learning goals across the country.

8th Grade Reading: Informational Text Standards

In 8th grade, the focus on Reading: Informational Text Standards becomes sharper and more refined. At this level, students are encouraged to delve deeper into complex texts to analyze and understand their structure, features, and critical arguments. They’re expected to identify and evaluate arguments and specific claims in a text, distinguishing between facts and opinions, and analyze how a text addresses related topics or themes. The standards aim to build students’ ability to comprehend and analyze texts across a range of subjects — from science and historical documents to technical texts. By fostering these analytical skills, the standards prepare students to tackle more challenging texts and concepts as they progress, ensuring they’re not just ready for the next grade, but for real-world applications of these essential skills.

📖 Envision an 8th Grader Excelling in Reading: Informational Text Standards

Let’s dive into the world of an 8th-grade classroom where informational text becomes the window to understanding complex ideas and arguments. Here’s what a student proficient in the Common Core State Standards for Reading: Informational Text in 8th grade looks like.

1. 🌍 Analyzing Argument and Claims

Watch as this student skillfully identifies an author’s argument in an article about climate change. They don’t just stop there; they go further to pinpoint and assess the evidence the author uses to support the argument, understanding the difference between opinions and facts.

2. 🧠 Determining Central Ideas

Hand them a feature story about a technological innovation, and they’ll impress you by extracting the central idea effortlessly. They can also summarize the key points that support this central idea, staying true to the text’s essence without veering off track with personal interpretations.

3. 🗨️ Evaluating Interactions

Our proficient reader sees the dialogue between texts. Given two articles on social media’s impact on teenagers, they can articulate how the authors address similar points differently, and even how one text might respond or add to the conversation of the other.

4. 🔍 Analyzing Word Choice

They are detectives of language, understanding how an author’s choice of words in an editorial can influence tone and meaning. They can spot the difference in connotation between “challenge” and “crisis” in a discussion about global water scarcity and explain how this choice affects the reader’s perception.

5. 📈 Integrating Information

Present this student with charts, graphs, and diagrams alongside a scientific text on renewable energy, and watch them integrate this visual information seamlessly into their understanding of the text. They highlight how these visuals complement and expand upon the written content.

6. 📚 Evaluating Arguments

When confronted with two opposing opinion pieces on school uniforms, this student doesn’t merely say which one they agree with; instead, they evaluate the strength of each argument based on the evidence presented, noting biases and logical fallacies.

In the lively environment of your 8th-grade classroom, this student doesn’t just absorb information passively. Instead, they engage critically with texts, displaying a mature understanding of complex issues and the nuances of argumentative writing, always anchored in the evidence provided. They are not just readers but thinkers, ready to navigate the Information Age with discernment and insight.

Embrace these facets of proficiency in your classroom, and witness your 8th graders transform informational reading into a skill that not only meets the standards but empowers them beyond the classroom walls.

8th Grade Reading: Informational Text Standards Resources: Assessments, Rubrics and Lesson Plans

Navigating through the sea of 8th-grade Informational Text Standards can be quite the adventure. But fear not! With the right map and compass, we’ll ensure you have a smooth journey. Let’s delve into key standards like Analyzing Arguments (RI.8.8), Determining a Central Idea (RI.8.2), and Evaluating Claims (RI.8.8), and how to transform these standards into engaging classroom practices.

1. Analyzing Arguments (RI.8.8)

Objective: Students will distinguish the claim in an argumentative text and analyze whether the evidence provided is sound and supports the claim effectively.

Example Assessment:

Have students read an argumentative article or essay. After reading, students will outline the article’s central argument, listing each piece of evidence presented. They are then tasked to write a brief analysis of whether the evidence effectively supports the claim, citing specific examples.

Assessment Rubric:

CriteriaExcellentGoodSatisfactoryNeeds Improvement
Identification of ClaimAccurately identifies the main claim.Identifies the main claim with minor inaccuracies.Identifies a claim, though possibly vague.Struggles to identify the main claim.
Analysis of EvidenceProvides a thorough analysis of evidence,Provides a good analysis, with some lack of depth.Provides a basic analysis of some evidence.Provides minimal/unconvincing analysis.
demonstrating clear understanding of how
it supports the claim.
Use of ExamplesUses specific examples from the text toUses relevant examples with minor errors inUses general examples with weak connectionFails to use specific examples or uses
support analysis effectively.application.to analysis.irrelevant examples.

Lesson Plan:

  1. Introduction (15 minutes): Present a definition of argumentative texts, emphasizing the importance of a clear claim and supporting evidence.

  2. Guided Reading (20 minutes): Select a short argumentative piece. Read it together as a class, identifying the claim and noting pieces of evidence.

  3. Independent Analysis (25 minutes): Provide students with a different article. Ask them to write a structured analysis, following a guideline that asks for the claim, the evidence, and their own evaluation of the evidence’s effectiveness.

  4. Peer Review (15 minutes): In pairs, students exchange their analyses for peer feedback. Discuss the importance of constructive criticism and how it can lead to improved understanding.

  5. Closure (5 minutes): Recap the key elements of an effective argument and the role of evidence in supporting claims. Highlight the value of analytical skills in navigating persuasive texts.

2. Determining a Central Idea (RI.8.2)

Objective: Students will identify the central idea of an informational text and analyze how it is developed over the course of the text.

Example Assessment:

Provide students with an informational text. They must identify the text’s central idea and write a paragraph summarizing how this idea is introduced, developed, and concluded, using examples from the text for support.

Assessment Rubric:

CriteriaExcellentGoodSatisfactoryNeeds Improvement
Identification of CentralClearly identifies the central idea andIdentifies the central idea, with minorIdentifies a possible central idea, butStruggles to identify the central
Ideademonstrates strong understanding.inaccuracies.lacks clarity.idea or identifies an incorrect one.
Development AnalysisExcellently analyzes the development ofAnalyzes the development with minor gaps.Offers a basic analysis of developmentProvides minimal or no analysis of
the central idea, using detailed examples.with limited examples.development.
Use of ExamplesUses a range of specific examples from theUses relevant examples with minor errors.Uses broad examples lacking specificityUses irrelevant or no examples from
text effectively.or detail.the text.

Lesson Plan:

  1. Introduction (10 minutes): Explain what a central idea is and why it is crucial in understanding informational texts.

  2. Guided Practice (20 minutes): Together, read a short informational text. Discuss and brainstorm what the central idea might be and how it is being developed.

  3. Independent Activity (30 minutes): Assign a longer informational text for individual reading. Instruct students to write a summary that focuses on the central idea and its development.

  4. Group Discussion (15 minutes): Have students form small groups to share their summaries. Discuss variations in understanding and how different aspects of the text highlighted its central idea differently for each student.

  5. Closure (5 minutes): Summarize the importance of identifying and understanding the central idea for comprehensive reading and analysis. Emphasize how this skill benefits academic and real-world information processing.

3. Evaluating Claims (RI.8.8)

Objective: Students will evaluate the claims in a text, distinguishing between claims that are supported by reasons and evidence from those that are not.

Example Assessment:

Assign a text with multiple claims. Students are to list each claim and categorize them as “supported” or “unsupported,” providing reasons for their determination and citing textual evidence.

Assessment Rubric:

CriteriaExcellentGoodSatisfactoryNeeds Improvement
Identification of ClaimsAccurately identifies all claims in theIdentifies most claims with minor errors.Identifies some claims, may miss others.Fails to accurately identify claims.
text.
Evaluation of SupportExcellently evaluates the support forGenerally evaluates support, with slightEvaluates support but with oversights orProvides minimal or incorrect
each claim, using specific examples.oversight.inconsistencies.evaluation of claim support.
Use of Textual EvidenceUses textual evidence expertly to justifyUses relevant textual evidence with minorUses general examples with weakUses irrelevant textual evidence or
evaluations.inaccuracies.connection to evaluations.lacks evidence.

Lesson Plan:

  1. Introduction (15 minutes): Begin with a discussion on the nature of claims in texts and how evidence supports these claims. Highlight the difference between subjective opinions and evidence-backed claims.

  2. Guided Analysis (20 minutes): Read a text together, identifying and discussing the different claims made throughout. Evaluate these claims as a class, deciding whether they’re supported or unsupported by evidence.

  3. Independent Evaluation (25 minutes): Provide a new text. Students work independently to identify claims and assess their validity based on evidence presented within the text.

  4. Class Debate (20 minutes): Organize a debate where students defend whether a claim is supported or unsupported, using textual evidence as their basis. This encourages engagement and deeper analysis.

  5. Closure (10 minutes): Review the key takeaways on evaluating claims and the importance of evidence. Discuss how these skills are not only vital for academic success but also for critical thinking in everyday life.

By harnessing the insight from these lesson plans and assessments, teachers can confidently navigate students through the complexities of informational texts, equipping them with the critical thinking skills necessary for academic and real-world success.